Too much fuel caused PTO damage? I doubt this, I'm more inclined to think a lean fuel mixture may have accelerated the wear (if anything). The reasons I think this are several:
1) The PO was forced to rebuild the carbs b/c they were plugged with "tempo trash" and running lean. (Lean = quick engine damage in a 2-stroke just as WAY too rich fuel ratio to oil can lead to slow death)
2) The gasket air leak didn't help, once the carbs were rebuilt the mixture may have been too lean as a result of an air leak.
3) Pop pressure has most effect during low speed operation and idle, the engine isn't developing much heat under these conditions thus aluminum is unlikely to melt and become damaged as long as some oil is in the crankcase. There is no oil coming from the injection pump during idle b/c the oil remaining in the bottom of crankcase is enough unless the crankcase is being flooded with fuel and the oil is washed away. In this case the spark plug will become wet with fuel and stop firing.
This is why I asked if there was oil still in the crankcase, b/c there would be only a small amount or maybe zero oil, if the carb was washing the fuel away. Always look inside the crankcase to see if there's enough oil!!!
And I think the motor wouldn't idle very well with this excess amount of fuel in PTO crankcase b/c the spark plug could not fire if it's wet and drowned with fuel.
15psi of pop is borderline too low IMO, and you might not notice it's a little too rich unless the motor loads up with fuel and PTO stops firing. To notice if it's too rich allow motor to idle for a few minutes and the crankcase will load up with fuel, then the plug will become wet and stop firing. So combine that with an air leak from the damaged gasket and maybe it offsets the mildly rich condition but now it's actually too lean at idle and not washing oil away but may run away on the trailer due to being lean, instead of too rich?
If a 2-stroke cylinder is not receiving fuel, it also isn't receiving oil lubrication normally b/c the fuel carries the oil throughout the crankcase and into the cylinders. A good amount of this oil sits down in the crankcase with the rotating assembly and comes from oil dropping out of the fuel as it travels through the crankcase on it's way to the cylinder. But, the crankcase can only hold a certain volume of oil before the oil begins slinging upward into the cylinders and back into the fuel where it's carried into the cylinders to be burned.
By this you can imagine the advantages and disadvantages of pre-mixing vs oil injection:
Oil injection provides a safety measure of providing oil even if the carb is plugged and not flowing fuel+oil (but it's only a partial solution to lack of lube due to plugged carbs).
Pre-mixing strategy is dangerous from the perspective if the carb is dry due to plugging of fuel passages then no oil is delivered to the cylinder, maybe zero oil!
Pre-mixing avoids the problem of oil injection system failure due to lack of proper maintenance or other problems that might occur such as a broken oil line.
Oil injection helps to conserve oil via the variable oil rate. It's unnecessary to have rich oil conditions at low speeds due to the engine is not making maximum heat.
Pre-mixing requires the carburetor to be recalibrated richer to deliver more fuel b/c the mixed oil displaces fuel while traveling through the carburetor jets. To compensate, the jets must be slightly larger by the percentage of oil mixed.
With a little imagination, you can perhaps add to this comparison list.