O please! I did not say that I agreed with the whole idea... I am somewhat of a novice, and not at all willing to go on record as anything but an armchair general, on this subject! (It is not my ski, and they are so expensive to fix...) So, I was speculating, and having fun doing it!
But that I was trying to build on the concept, and that IF VIABLE, it could really be a help for some. I have a Sawmill. It has a gearbox. It is a swingmill. It is a Peterson. (
WWW.petersonsawmills.com) There is a mill from Canada, that has the same basic design, (swingmill), but it's gear box uses GREASE! (Mine has synthetic oil) the Grease they selected is an interesting kind... it has cushioning built into it! The Mill in Canada can be found here:
http://www.doublecut.com/
Anyway, they are doing kind of the impossible too... I think they resorted to grease so theirs could swing 180°. (Not for sure on that)
Anyway, I am curious as to how your experiment turns out! How many hrs you get on it, and if/and or when if fails. In either case, if you have found a way to extend the life of an engine with a leaking rotary seal, by 1,2, or more seasons, then it is certainly worth looking in to.
I still think you should consider place a zerk on one hose, (maybe the IN line) and vent the OUT one, so you can grease it daily. This could potentially replace grease, that works it's way out. Even if it is a closed system, with a T and a zerk on the 3rd leg of the T.
I am trying to place ideas on the table, but by no means am I paying for or responsible for my own ideas, hence the caveat!
And, I think it is great to see others OUTSIDE the box.
Trying to warn you (in the name of integrity, and honesty about me!)
Nate
PS, let the blind lead the blind, and they both fall into the ditch! (sometimes that is a good place to be, if a big truck is coming though!).
I hope you are not offended at me, for this, but trying to communicate honestly, and place what I say in the right category in your mind!
Nate