• This site contains eBay affiliate links for which Sea-Doo Forum may be compensated.

RXP-X 260 owners

Status
Not open for further replies.

asianlink37

Member
So I've been researching the new RXP-X 260 and I'm pretty much sold on it being my next ski but I just had a few questions that I couldn't exactly get answers for. My ski now can burn through a full tank pretty quick if I'm wide open for any extended period of time. I was wondering what kind of time I'll have on a SC RXP with the same size fuel tank? I've been literally having dreams about this ski but this was a genuine concern I had. Any existing RXP owners, I would greatly appreciate any kind of feedback regarding my question and just any other personal opinions of your ski. Thanks again in advance
 
I looked in the 2009 RXPX 255 shop manual and it states the fuel consumption at WOT is 19.5 US Gal/HR. Full take at WOT will run you about +/- 49minutes per the shop manual.

If you can get a look at the shop manual for the model you are looking at it will be in the back under Techincal Specifications.

As a friend of mine says..... If you going to work the mule, you got to feed the mule.
 
Oh I'm all for "feeding the mule" but I guess I just wanted to make sure the mule is worth the feed. I looked up the owners manual and it didn't give any specs like you were talking about. Didn't really surprise me though. Performance specs aren't normally listed in factory owners manuals.
 
I don't own one but I ride with two guys that own the rxpx 260,

First, totally bad azz ski's, IMO the perfect combination of style, performance, handling, I really don't think there is a better model out there, although there are some close 2nd's....

Second, the ONLY downside I can find is with the fuel consumption, the best word to describe it is "terrible"

I always have to make ride plans around these two clowns because they are always running out of fuel. Granted they are both in their mid 20's, love speed, and rarely lay off the boost, which is the problem. now some of my buddies that have the same power plant but are in their 40's (ie: they behave) seem to get significantly better fuel economy.

they only way to get acceptable (not good, just acceptable) fuel economy is to avoid pulling a Cole Tricket. "I'm dropping the Hammer Harry !" and based on our little expierements it has a lot to do with how quickly they go from 0-50, which is our normal cruising speed, if they hammer it up to cruising speed, or do a lot of horsing around, such as 180's, or hard s-turns, general jackazzery, then i'm lucky if they can run 60-65, tops 70 miles before I hear their buzzers going off. So in general they are running somewhere between 4.6 mpg up to maybe 5.2.

When I ride with my older buddies, we are easily pushing 10 additional miles without any trouble at all, approx 5.2 up to low 6's. The key seems to not hammering from a dead stop and keeping cruising rpms under 5K, econo/touring mode.

The only downside to behaving, is it isn't as much fun thinking about conserving fuel as it is being Cole.


I haven't had to tow either of them back to the dock yet, but its just a matter of time :)

1.gif


my only advice is to behave through half the ride, and 1/3 of the way back, then start with the jackazzery, and you'll make it back on fumes, but with a big smile on your face.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a 2009 RXT-X with the 255.

I go riding with other locally both in the ocean and river runs. I can go for about 4 or 5 hours of miscellaneous general use. On the RXT-X, the first half of the tank goes pretty quick if you "have your thumb in it". The second half will last longer.

I absolutely love the ski. If you ride respectively you can get 5 hours with no issues. Ride hard and it will be loser to 3 hours for sure.
 
I have a Rxpx 260- When your in sports mode and your on it it'll drink for sure or if your the type of rider that varies rpm a lot it'll drink also. But I found if you are just in touring mode that you get pretty decent mileage- eco mode even better.
 
I have a modified RXPX260. 16 PSI at 8800 RPM. I can burn through 20 gallons of fuel 1-2 hours of mixed riding.

Even in stock form it sucks gas like crazy. The big problem is the T3 hull rides very deep in the water so there is a lot of drag, which burns more fuel.

With all that said, it is by far the best all around performance ski I have owned. The G's the hull will pull in turns is like nothing you have every experienced. 75+ mph full lock turn and the bitch grabs, turns, and rockets out of a decreasing radius turn like butter. It tracks straight and true in choppy stuff too. Biggest complaint, its the driest ride ever. No need to wear a bathing suit because you aren't getting wet unless you come off, which can happen if you can't hold on to it. :)
 
I have a modified RXPX260. 16 PSI at 8800 RPM. I can burn through 20 gallons of fuel 1-2 hours of mixed riding.

Even in stock form it sucks gas like crazy. The big problem is the T3 hull rides very deep in the water so there is a lot of drag, which burns more fuel.

With all that said, it is by far the best all around performance ski I have owned. The G's the hull will pull in turns is like nothing you have every experienced. 75+ mph full lock turn and the bitch grabs, turns, and rockets out of a decreasing radius turn like butter. It tracks straight and true in choppy stuff too. Biggest complaint, its the driest ride ever. No need to wear a bathing suit because you aren't getting wet unless you come off, which can happen if you can't hold on to it. :)

See now everything I'm reading says the T3 hull lifts you out of the water so there's as little drag as possible until of course you make a turn at which point it carves in...? Is this not correct?
 
See now everything I'm reading says the T3 hull lifts you out of the water so there's as little drag as possible until of course you make a turn at which point it carves in...? Is this not correct?

Definitely not the case. If you want a hull that rides on top of the water you need an FZR.
 
I have an 08 rxpx 255. It's a great ski. I'm sure the extra features will make it more of an enjoyable ride. I put around 3.5 hours today cruising and throttle wide open and I went through almost a tank and a quarter. I agree with the acceleration, it's nothing I've experienced before, and I've been on many jet skis. It is a very comfy and fun ride.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I have a 2012 RXT-x. When the fuel buzzer goes off I have about 20 miles left. You may be stopping sooner than you have to for your heavy throttle riders.
 
I have a 2012 RXT-x. When the fuel buzzer goes off I have about 20 miles left. You may be stopping sooner than you have to for your heavy throttle riders.

20 miles seems like a lot for having less than a quarter tank left. But what made you go with the RXT-X instead of the RXP-X? I've done comparisons but I'm just looking for feedback from people who have actually ridden these skis
 
I had a RXT-X and bought another, but the suspension model. Not much room to work on anything on that ski. A group went riding a couple of weeks ago. We had extra gas with us so we tested the RXT-X aS. It ran out of gas at 91 miles.
 
The T3 hull of the RXPX is incredible. So much better than anything else out right now. The only reason to get the S3 is if you absolutely need to have room for 3 people or towing. If you want the ultimate performance hull and 2 seats is ok, then get the RXPX. That ski and hull takes this sport to another level.
 
Forgot to mention, the aS suspension ski holds more fuel. I think it holds 18.5 gallons. Most other Seadoos hold 15.9 gallons.
 
I went with the RXT as it is a three seater.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

CJ,
since I kind of sold both my ski's unexpectedly, and now i'm shopping.

Curious how comfortable you felt on the twisties with your T-X, no issues powering through some of the tighter turns or making quick adjustments avoiding protruding stumps and such ?

My primary goal is to end up with a conversion ski, but if I settle on a go-between ski between then and now I was really thinking the RXPX AND RXTX were viable options that might make me really happy, I am going to go look at a 05 rxp only because its close to work and priced very reasonable, but I really think i'll be settling for 2nd best if I don't spend the $ to get an X model.
 
Lets meet up, you can ride it,,,,

The hull is fantastic in turns. Right after I bought it I bought $550 of goodies. Wedge, impeller, grate and steering extension I NEVER installed them as the ski runs simply fantastic. I still have them new in the box.

The handling is very good and easy to steer around things at top spend and not feel like you will be tossed.

I wish it had the Hump GTX seat as that seat is like riding on a cloud. But I can't say enough about the ski. Only reason I'd sell it is to buy a new one. Don't care what the cost is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lets meet up, you can ride it,,,,

The hull is fantastic in turns. Right after I bought it I bought $550 of goodies. Wedge, impeller, grate and steering extension I NEVER installed them as the ski runs simply fantastic. I still have them new in the box.

The handling is very good and easy to steer around things at top spend and not feel like you will be tossed.

I wish it had the Hump GTX seat as that seat is like riding on a cloud. But I can't say enough about the ski. Only reason I'd sell it is to buy a new one. Don't care what the cost is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

thanks, might take you up on that. I've never really given the RXTX a proper assessment, but i've followed some reviews and it seems to handle heavy chop pretty well I just wasn't sure about tight cornering on twisties, and with so many technical rides within driving range I don't want a ski that makes me feel like i'm going to be sliding sideways into the mangroves at 55.
 
Give me a heads, I'll make the drive. I just want to get the skis wet. Been over a month now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top